[Black "Analysis"]
[White "Analysis"]
[Event "Gonotsky's Great Escape"]
[Date "November 2002, by Murray Cash and Nemesis"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]

1. 10-14 22-18 2. 11-15 18-11 3. 8-15 26-22 4. 6-10 22-17 
5. 1-6 23-19 6. 9-13 27-23 7. 13-22 25-11 8. 7-16 29-25 
{(A-0) (Eugene Frazier's "Hornet's Nest". Scott played 24-20 in his game against Gonotsky, missing out on this much stronger attack. See 2nd IM book p386.) } 
9. 16-20 {(A-1) 6-9 certainly doesn't look hopeful and all other moves lose. } 
32-27 10. 3-7 {(A) 4-8 and 6-9 were mentioned in the Fortman/Sheehan article, but not 3-7. } 
31-26 {(B) 30-26 and 25-22 only draw } 
11. 4-8 {(C) 14-17 loses, 5-9 is hopeless } 
25-22 {(D) 19-16 is a quicker draw } 
12. 7-11 19-16 
{(E) 22-18 and 22-17 are weaker draws } 
13. 12-19 23-7 14. 2-11 24-19 {(F) 26-22 and 22-17 are also weaker draws. } 
15. 11-15 19-16 {(G) 28-24, 27-23 draw quickly } 
16. 8-12 16-11 
{(H) 30-25, 27-23 give easier draws } 
17. 5-9 11-7 {(I) Would anyone give red a hope in this position? } 
18. 14-18 21-17 {(J) 30-25 12-16 7-2 16-19 2-7 9-14 7-2 6-9 2-6 9-13 6-9 19-24 28-19 15-31 22-6 31-29 9-18 29-25* draw } 
19. 18-25 30-21 20. 9-13 26-22 
{(K) 17-14 10-17 21-14 6-10 14-9 15-18 7-2 18-22 26-17 13-22 2-7 10-14 7-10 14-17 10-14 17-21 14-17 22-26 17-22 26-31 and neither 27-23 nor allowing the exchange gives white enough resources to win. } 
21. 15-18 22-15 22. 10-19 17-14 23. 6-10 7-3 24. 10-17 21-14 
25. 13-17 3-7 26. 17-22 7-11 27. 22-26 11-15 28. 19-24 28-19 
29. 26-31 27-23 30. 31-27 15-18 31. 27-24 19-15 32. 12-16 15-11 
33. 24-19 {draw}